Artist chains up dog till it dies: Art or Animal Abuse

Guillermo Habacuc Vargas had 2 children catch this dog. He paid the kids for this. He then chained the dog and used the dog as “art”. He told everyone not to feed this dog. The dog died in the gallery. He calls himself an artist. Do you think so too ?

[ link here and here ]

I’d like to show him some art of my own. His pointless killing is outrageous and shows that he is without a moral compass. What next, killing a person for “art”? Maybe he also thinks the holocaust to be “art” ?

I’m not sure what the cultural bias may have to do with it (as in some countries dogs have less respect as animals), but I agree, and I think that’s what the artist was in fact trying to portray.

That we only care about things after they die. But the fact that he instructed people not to feed it, obviously meant someone showed interest, thereby sort of negating his whole premise.

9 replies on “Artist chains up dog till it dies: Art or Animal Abuse”

By mentioning him on your blog, you already achieved the controversy he wanted. This kind of people is not worthy to be mentioned by us.

But since this is call arts, why not we chain him up and let him die of hunger. That would be the greatest piece of art.

can i scold my heart lungs out here? (ahh i tak peduli even if you dont let me.)

eh artist, you are sick and sadist. i hate you! your parents never teach you! your school never educate your properly. your whole generations sucks! how can you do that to an animal who do nothing to your god damn it family! CB! CB!!! KNN!! HK!! BB!

aku geram!!!!! biar mampos kau kena langgar lori, kena makan anjing!!!


how i really wish i can punish all those setans!!

hhhmmmm… this kind of things really made me feel very sad… cats dogs or whatever… there are living things… should have never done anything like that…

such cruelty…

Comments are closed.